EPIDEMIOLOGY AND HEALTH DATA INSIGHTS

Keyword: Universal Health Coverage

2 results found.

Editorial
Diagnosis Without Dialogue: A Rapid Analysis of Kazakhstan's New Healthcare Concept 2026–2029 and the Missing Voice of the Health Sector
Epidemiology and Health Data Insights, 2(3), 2026, ehdi038, https://doi.org/10.63946/ehdi/18375
ABSTRACT: In March 2026, Kazakhstan approved a new national Healthcare Development Concept for 2026–2029. This editorial provides a rapid critical analysis of the document, comparing it with its 2022–2026 predecessor. We identify genuine advances, including expanded indicator architecture, health technology assessment tools, digital health ambitions, and an explicit adolescent health agenda alongside persistent structural weaknesses: the absence of a theory of change, limited economic evaluation, no comprehensive human resources for health strategy, and a thin monitoring and evaluation framework. We also raise a chronic governance concern: the Concept was adopted without meaningful consultation with the professional and academic health community, in tension with President of Kazakhstan Tokayev's stated commitment to a hearing state.
Review Article
Towards Universal Health Coverage in Kazakhstan from the Alma-Ata Declaration in 1978 to Astana Declaration in 2018: Challenges, Successes and Future Outlook
Epidemiology and Health Data Insights, 1(3), 2025, ehdi012, https://doi.org/10.63946/ehdi/16892
ABSTRACT: For centuries, health was viewed from the lens of biomedicine as the core. This view considered medical professionals and hospitals as the sole agents and venues where health could be obtained, with only passive mentions of the impact of social determinants of health. In a paradigm shift from this view in 1978, at the Alma-Ata Declaration in Kazakhstan, 134 member countries of the WHO formalized the recognition of the social determinants of health into a global policy. Factors such as accessibility, affordability, availability, social and economic status, and education about health services are crucial for population health. The Alma-Ata Declaration required the governments of member countries to include deliberate policies that strengthen and promote population health, by ensuring that social measures are included in their national development plans while recognizing the rights of collective and individual participation of their populations. The phrase “Primary Health Care” (PHC) was then adopted. It was defined as “essential health care based on practical, scientifically sound and socially acceptable methods which are of relevant technology, made accessible and affordable to families and communities through their participation”. Health became a human right underpinned by equity and population participation principles. The aftermath of the Declaration was an immediate implementation challenge. It was soon to be realized that PHC interventions are not linear and generalizable like biomedical interventions which have specific measures and predictable outcomes. To date, there is no blueprint for universal intervention measures because economic disparities, social and situational contexts differ and determine the success of any intervention measure. Our review explores the challenges and successes of the implementation of PHC in Kazakhstan, the birthplace of the global health policy on PHC.